RadiusRankCompare

Dated vendor comparison index

AI Search Platform and AEO Service Comparisons

The market contains three different purchases: self-serve visibility software, focused validation subscriptions, and managed execution. Choose the delivery model first, then compare renewal terms, prompt capacity, engines, markets, implementation labor and evidence access.

Updated 8 vendor source index

Scope and boundaryEight vendors were normalized from official sources on August 12, 2026. RadiusRank's former one-time article offer remains in that historical dataset, while a separate August 14 record documents the current monthly validation subscription. This first-party comparison does not score accuracy, usability, support or outcomes.

Data as of August 14, 2026. Next scheduled review: September 14, 2026.

8offers normalized
3delivery models
7public entry prices

What the evidence supports

  1. Public entry offers ranged from a $79 month-to-month RadiusRank subscription to managed services starting at $1,597 and $3,500 monthly.
  2. The lowest sampled self-serve monthly offers were Peec AI at $95 and Profound at $99 monthly billed annually.
  3. NoGood used custom pricing, so it remains blank in the dataset instead of being treated as free or zero.
  4. Capacity units include prompts, questions, credits, posts and service outputs and cannot be converted one-for-one.

Eight-offer decision table

Open the detailed comparison for scope, limitations and official source links.

VendorPublic entry priceDelivery model
RadiusRank (current, August 14)$79/monthRenews monthly until canceled; no article writing
AEO Engine$1,597/monthHuman-managed AEO program
AthenaHQ$295/monthSelf-serve enterprise AEO platform
Trailblazer Marketing$3,500/monthManaged marketing service
Peec AI$95/monthSelf-serve AI search analytics
Profound$99/month billed annuallyEnterprise AI visibility and agent analytics
NoGoodCustom quoteManaged growth agency
Scrunch AI$250/month billed annuallyAI visibility and agent-experience platform

Shortlist by work that must get done

01

Monitoring

Choose a self-serve platform when an internal team can operate the data and implement findings.

02

Focused validation

Choose a cancel-anytime validation subscription when the team wants to prove value before broader implementation.

03

Managed execution

Choose a service when strategy, content, technical changes and distribution need external ownership.

Methodology

  1. Reviewed official vendor pages on August 12, 2026.
  2. Recorded public entry price, native billing basis, capacity unit, engine scope and implementation model.
  3. Preserved custom and annual-billing notes and did not invent missing prices.
  4. Published RadiusRank's August 14 offer change separately and left the August 12 CSV untouched.
  5. Created detailed pages only for vendors already present in the RadiusRank comparison navigation.

Limitations

  • The dataset does not test accuracy, user experience, support or business outcomes.
  • Enterprise and negotiated terms may differ from public offers.
  • RadiusRank is included and has a commercial interest in the category.

Questions

Which AEO tool is best?

There is no universal winner. Match the delivery model, collection method, engine and market coverage, implementation ownership and evidence access to the team's actual workflow.

Why not rank vendors with one score?

A single score hides incompatible operating models and subjective weights. Every field is shown separately so buyers can apply their own requirements.

Sources and data

Found a changed price, product limit or source? Email team@radiusrank.com with the official URL. We preserve the snapshot date instead of silently rewriting historical data.

Start with the evidence

Start with an inspectable baseline.

The free diagnostic shows the questions, public technical issues and citation-readiness gaps before you start a subscription or scoped service.

Run the free diagnostic